Noah looks for dry land. |
In
keeping with the on-going, desperate attempt by religious fundamentalists to
prove the Bible is factually correct, a noted explorer now claims to have proof
of Noah’s flood. That’s the one that the
Bible says covered the whole world and killed all living creatures except one
family.
Actually,
Robert Ballard didn’t find that. He found evidence
of a massive flood in what is now Turkey.
That’s not the same thing as finding Noah's flood.
Ballard,
who is credited with uncovering the Titanic in its watery grave as well as the
World War II battleship the Bismarck, said his study of the Turkish shoreline
turned up evidence of a civilization swept away 7,500 years by a flood.
Despite the loud shouting, Ballard was actually building on research first announced in 1990s by geologists
William Ryan and Walter Pittman. They proposed that the Mediterranean Sea rose
and inundated the original shoreline of the Black Sea. Naturally, any humans living in that area
would also have been swamped.
Ballard |
His search has been spurred by the biblical account in Genesis 7:
11 In the six hundredth
year of Noah’s life, on the seventeenth day of the second month—on that day all
the springs of the great deep burst forth, and the floodgates of the heavens
were opened. 12 And rain fell on the
earth forty days and forty nights…
17 For forty days the
flood kept coming on the earth, and as the waters increased they lifted the ark
high above the earth. 18 The waters rose
and increased greatly on the earth, and the ark floated on the surface of the
water. 19 They rose greatly on the
earth, and all the high mountains under the entire heavens were covered.
Mt. Ararat |
If it didn’t happen, then one of the underlying stories behind the Christian faith turns out simply to be a myth.
Therefore,
fundamentalists have read the news of Ballard’s findings with great
interest. He may have actually
pinpointed a Noah-like flood. There also may have been a tiny civilization that
was inundated. So far, so good.
However,
Ballard is using “robotic technology,” according to a published account, that
takes the research back 12,000 years to when the ice that covered much of the
land began to melt and caused floods.
That’s
a problem. Fundamentalist accept that
the Earth is no more than 9,000 years old.
What a dilemma. They can accept
the flood and deny their own creationist nonsense. Or disavow their cherished flood and the
Bible to remain wedded to the fake history.
Then,
too, this flood covered an estimated 100,000 square miles. That’s a big flood, but not big enough. The biblical account claims that the floor
covered the entire Earth and killed every living creature except those safely
living on Noah’s ark.
22 Everything on dry
land that had the breath of life in its nostrils died. 23 Every
living thing on the face of the earth was wiped out; people and animals and the
creatures that move along the ground and the birds were wiped from the earth.
Only Noah was left, and those with him in the ark. (Genesis 7)
Another
dilemma: accept the smaller flood, which other humans, besides Noah, survived
and that the Bible is inaccurate; or deny the flood and the accompanying
research.
Regardless
of the answer, there’s another problem: The water can’t just disappear. Water
sits on the surface of the ground only when it can’t go lower. If the whole Earth is covered with a flood,
where did the water go? It can’t
evaporate, since it would only return as rain.
It can’t go into underground caverns since they don’t exist and the
ground would have been totally saturated.
What
is a poor fundamentalist to do?
How
about recognizing that the story, once placed in a historical context
constructed by Ballard or anyone else, can’t be accurate? History isn’t that cut and dry.
Sure,
there may have been a flood. Why
not? After all, other cultures have
histories of floods. Such events are
commonplace today. There’s no reason
they didn’t occur as frequently in the past.
One
ancient document, the Babylonian saga called the Gilgamesh, for example, has a
detailed account of a huge flood. The
tale precedes the Bible by at least 1,000 years and yet contains very similar
ideas: there’s one survivor who sent out a raven and a dove to test the depth
of the receding waters.
In
fact, historians have long recognized that the Gilgamesh provided a framework
for the Noah account.
Noah's Ark after landing |
However,
that flood cannot match the biblical version.
No flood could cover the Earth so that only a mountain top – not the
world’s highest mountain either – was visible.
At the same time, DNA testing has shown that humans all evolved from
African ancestors, but that we contain DNA from other human species. More than Noah and his family had to have
survived.
What
a problem for literalists: accept the Bible account and ignore the research which
provides some support for the cherished stories; or accept the research and
concede the Bible isn’t 100 percent accurate.
Ballard
intends to keep searching for the flood.
Everyone else will just have to keep searching for answers to questions
raised by his findings.
This
is my last post for 2012. I’ll be away
until the New Year. I have enjoyed
writing these articles on religious history and hope anyone reading them does,
too.
Happy
New Year!
Bill
Long-time
religious historian Bill Lazarus regularly writes about religion and religious
history. He also speaks at various
religious organizations throughout Florida.
You can reach him at www.williamplazarus.net. He is the author of the famed Unauthorized
Biography of Nostradamus; The Last Testament of Simon Peter; The Gospel Truth: Where Did the Gospel
Writers Get Their Information; Noel:
The Lore and Tradition of Christmas Carols; and Dummies Guide to Comparative
Religion. His books are available on Amazon.com,
Kindle, bookstores and via various publishers.
He can also be followed on Twitter.
You
can enroll in his on-line class, Comparative Religion for Dummies, at
http://www.udemy.com/comparative-religion-for-dummies/?promote=1
No comments:
Post a Comment