Judge Jones |
My Facebook
friends pushing for creationism – or under its current name of intelligent
design (ID) – continue to fuss and fume.
They would prefer to forget they already had their chance to prove their
point without shouting. Experts in
support of creationism came to a Federal Court in the Middle District of
Pennsylvania in November 2004 to argue their case.
They were routed.
No wonder creationists
pretend it didn’t happen.
The case was heard
by Federal Judge John E. Jones III, a Republican appointed two years earlier by
President George W. Bush. It grew out of a decision by the Board of Education
in the Dover Area School District to require that ID be taught on par with
evolution. Eleven parents then sued,
resulting in the trial.
Professor Behe |
It didn’t go well
for creationists. Their lead witness, Lehigh
University biochemist Michael Behe, a long-time leader of the movement,
conceded that "there are no peer-reviewed
articles by anyone advocating for intelligent design supported by pertinent
experiments or calculations which provide detailed rigorous accounts of how
intelligent design of any biological system occurred.”
In fact, there has never been any articles that supports creationism ever submitted to
any scientific publication. That’s because there is no evidence.
Actually, Behe went even further and admitted that, under
his definition, to get creationism accepted by science, even a field so discredited
as astrology would have to be included.
Not even creationists can argue on behalf of astrology, which has been
carefully studied and found to have zero scientific basis.
The one paper he did co-author (but not submit) didn’t help
his cause. Under oath, Behe admitted
that the same biochemical outcomes he ascribed to creationism would also evolve
in 20,000 years “even if the parameters of the simulation were rigged to make
that outcome as unlikely as possible.”
Naturally, the 20,000 years caused creationists heartburn
since many are wedded to the impossibly short time period of 8,000 to 9,000
years for the existence of the Earth.
None of the testimony for the defense got any better. As Judge
Jones noted defendants' protestations to the contrary, witnesses unanimously
described ID as a religious argument. "In that vein, the writings of leading ID
proponents revealed that the designer postulated by their argument is the God of
Christianity,” the judge wrote, concluding that “the overwhelming evidence at trial
established that ID is a religious view, a mere re-labeling of creationism, and
not a scientific theory.”
Judge Jones cited basic flaws in theory:
“We find that ID fails on three different levels, any one of
which is sufficient to preclude a determination that ID is science. They are:
(1) ID violates the centuries-old ground rules of science by invoking and permitting
supernatural causation; (2) the argument of irreducible complexity, central to
ID, employs the same flawed and illogical contrived dualism that doomed creation
science in the 1980s; and (3) ID's negative attacks on evolution have been
refuted by the scientific community. … It is additionally important to note
that ID has failed to gain acceptance in the scientific community, it has not
generated peer-reviewed publications, nor has it been the subject of testing
and research.”
He ended by labeling the Board’s decision to require the
teaching of creationism as “breathtaking inanity … when considered against
the factual backdrop which has now been fully revealed through this trial.”
The
local population agreed. In the school board
election that took place Nov. 8, less than a week after the trial and before
the judge issued his ruling, the eight candidates who opposed intelligent design
swept every pro-intelligent-design candidate from the board.
If
we have learned anything from this, it’s that scholarship and research mean
nothing in the face of belief.
Creationists happily smother centuries of research and reason by making
broad, unsupported claims.
Nor
does any of these arguments matter, because belief is merely a guess. Whether someone guessed right or wrong won’t change
a thing. Whatever is the truth will
happen to all of us. I personally
believe there’s no God, no afterlife, no meaning to be life.
I
could be wrong. I’ll find out.
In
the interim, I will continue to oppose anyone’s attempt to impose on the rest of us a belief
unsupported by a shred of scientific fact.
Long-time
religious historian Bill Lazarus regularly writes about religion and religious
history with an occasional foray into American culture. He holds an ABD in American Studies from Case
Western Reserve University. He also
speaks at various religious organizations throughout Florida. You can reach him at wplazarus@aol.com. He is the author of the famed Unauthorized
Biography of Nostradamus; The Last Testament of Simon Peter; The Gospel Truth: Where Did the Gospel
Writers Get Their Information; Noel:
The Lore and Tradition of Christmas Carols; and Dummies Guide to Comparative
Religion. A recent book, Passover in Prison, which
details abuse of Jewish inmates in American prisons. His books are available on Amazon.com,
Kindle, bookstores and via various publishers.
He can also be followed on Twitter.
No comments:
Post a Comment