For
most of my lives, I have been reading and writing about religious history. My interest has always been in how a belief
developed, not in its accuracy. After
all, no one has enough knowledge to know a belief is “true” or not. That would require post-life experience to
prove there’s a heaven or hell, a god or anything else people believe in.
By
studying history, religious historians have shown how beliefs arise, what they
are based on and what they absorbed from other faiths. That’s good enough,
The
information also serves as a counter against claimants of various faiths who
insist that their belief is “true” and, therefore, everyone else is wrong.
That’s
nonsense.
Ancient Egyptian monotheism |
That
reality does not make any of those beliefs true or false. It simply explains their origins. Claiming a modern religion is correct
necessitates claiming that the precursor faiths are also correct.
Mary Baker Eddy |
Events
that galvanized a faith included the Hebrew slaves leaving Egypt (which hasn’t been
proven historically, but is real to Jews), Jesus’ crucifixion (also not proven
historically but real to Christians), the hegira (Muhammad’s escape from Mecca
to Yathrib) and the death of Báb, which led to the Baha’i faith.
Thus
inspired, followers were sure that the fledgling belief had a basis in reality.
Maybe.
After
all, historical research has rarely confirmed religious claims. Worse, woefully little is known of the lives of
Buddha, Zoroaster, Moses or Jesus, for example.
Much of what is still touted as truth has been filtered through believers, creating
more myths than facts.
Statue of Buddha |
Besides,
all the beliefs vary, which makes it hard for any to claim some kind of divine
imprint. Christianity may be the world’s
largest faith, but Islam, Buddhism and Hinduism all have at least 1 billion
followers, which must be an indication of their strength and “divine” support.
In
some cases, they are diametrically opposed and impossible to reconcile. That’s one reason there are conflicts between
them. Ironically, they are all basically
similar: they each offer a way of life built around harmony and cooperation. Unfortunately, those are abstract concepts
that fail to stop violence and hatred.
(Please
read Comparative Religion for Dummies,
which illustrates how similar the three major monotheistic faiths are.)
All
beliefs change. For example, the idea
that the Bible is 100 percent correct developed in the 1800s because of new research
that demonstrated it wasn’t. Prior to
that, the Bible was recognized as a moral and ethical guide, not an encyclopedia
of facts. The Judaism of today does not
resemble the Judaism of Moses, nor does Christianity correspond to what Paul
taught.
Then,
too, all of these faiths started small and usually as spinoffs of existing
religions. Christianity was a sect of Judaism; Baha’i, a sect of Islam; Latter
Day Saints, a sect of Christianity; and so on.
Farsi developed as a counter to existing Persian faiths. Buddha was trying to clean up Hinduism and
ended up as the “enlightened” center of a different belief. Muhammad was instilling a monotheistic view
into his culture.
And
so on.
Everyone
involved in creating a religion did so with the highest ideals and a firm
conviction of heavenly support.
Whether
that’s true or not does not matter.
The
maelstrom of religious ideas explains why the founders of this country opted
for freedom of religion rather than get caught up in the ever-whirling battles
between believers. That may have been
the wisest decision that group of men ever made. Look at what took place when that didn’t
happen: the endless enmity between India and Pakistan; Israel and its Muslim
counterparts; and so on.
Crusades |
Too
many of today’s run of politicians, each vying to be the most ignorant,
continue to try to shove their beliefs down the throats of Americans. They run for office, touting their faith,
without the slightest indication that they understand how and why that belief
developed and its place among the 4,600 religions known to exist.
Sen. Ted Cruz sermonizing |
As
such, they are continuing to heighten animosities between religions, creating
the kind of combative society exactly the opposite of what their beliefs hope
to inspire.
One
solution would be to return religious history to the classroom, which was
allowed in the past, but was blocked by religious fanaticism. Another would be to ban religious discussion
in political campaigns. A third would be
to continually vote against anyone announcing plans to impose any religious idea
on constituents or promising to follow the dictates of faith rather than the
needs of society.
Until
proof exist for any religion – claims in a “holy” book are the exact opposite
of proof – the best choice is ensuring that religion remains a private choice
and not a requirement.
Long-time
religious historian Bill Lazarus regularly writes about religion and religious
history with an occasional foray into American culture. He holds an ABD in American Studies from Case
Western Reserve University. He also
speaks at various religious organizations throughout Florida. You can reach him at www.williamplazarus.net. He is the author of the famed Unauthorized
Biography of Nostradamus; The Last Testament of Simon Peter; The Gospel Truth: Where Did the Gospel
Writers Get Their Information; Noel:
The Lore and Tradition of Christmas Carols; and Dummies Guide to Comparative
Religion. A recent book, Passover in Prison, which
details abuse of Jewish inmates in American prisons. His books are available on Amazon.com,
Kindle, bookstores and via various publishers.
He can also be followed on Twitter.
No comments:
Post a Comment