Ohio National Guardsmen fire tear gas at students. |
I’ve been noticing many references to the Kent State Shootings,
the May 4, 1970 deaths of four students and the wounding of nine others at the
hands of the Ohio National Guard. For
example, recently, a Louisiana State University fraternity had to apologize for
making an insulting reference to the event.
Put
up prior to an LSU-Kent State football game, students posted a painted bed
sheet that read: “getting massacred is nothing to Kent State.”
That
was created more than 43 years after the Shootings, yet the event remains fresh
even in the minds of students born decades after the tragedy.
In
addition, a May 4 welcome center has opened on Kent State campus in northeast
Ohio. Meanwhile, scholars continue to
pump out papers, including looks at the multiple songs created after the
fusillade to attempts to figure out why the shots were fired in the first
place.
May 4 Welcome Center |
Nixon |
The
steady interest seems strange. Since
1970, many other major events have occurred in this country, including
Watergate and the subsequent resignation of President Richard Nixon, the end of
the Vietnam War, the collapse of the savings & loans, Operation Desert
Storm and the related invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, 9/11, the election of
the first black president and so much more.
Yet,
the memory of Watergate has faded, leaving only the “gate” suffix to mark other
scandals. Who talks about Vietnam
anymore? Nixon is dead; the Oliver Stone
movie about him garnered little interest and lost an estimated $21 million. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan seem far
away and get little coverage these days.
Dr. Lewis |
Why
does the Kent State Shootings maintain its preeminent position?
Authors
Jerry Lewis (my one-time sociology professor) and Thomas Hensley gave three
reasons in their 1998 paper titled The May 4 Shootings at Kent State University: The Search for Historical Accuracy.
·
The
shootings have “come to symbolize a great American tragedy which occurred at
the height of the Vietnam War era, a period in which the nation found itself
deeply divided both politically and culturally.”
· The
wounds created by the war have not healed.
·
The
Shootings provided a way to learn from the past. “…better ways have to be found
to deal with these types of confrontations.”
That’s
not as true today. Wounds have
closed. American veterans have returned
to Vietnam and met their counterparts there.
We now have open relations with that country. Certainly, police agencies have learned how
better to cope with rioters, such as happened in California over the weekend
when drunken students attacked law enforcement officers. Pepper spray, tear gas, and rubber bullets substituted
for live ammo.
Kent
State, however, continues to hold onto public imagination.
Guardsmen open fire. |
The
main reason relates to the Lewis-Hensley’s first point, but is not limited to
the Vietnam War Era. The divide between
sections of the population, highlighted by the war, was irreparably ruptured by
the Shootings.
National
polls showed that half of Americans thought the students were rioters who
deserved to be shot, even after legal proceedings proved there was no
riot. (Actually, we were standing
quietly on the Commons when National Guard troops fired tear gas at us.) Courts also held that the students had the
right to meet.
Opponents
held to their opinions even after the state of Ohio agreed to pay $675,000 each
to the families of the wounded and dead students and issued the following
statement:
In retrospect,
the tragedy of May 4, 1970 should not have occurred. The students may have
believed that they were right in continuing their mass protest in response to
the Cambodian invasion, even though this protest followed the posting and
reading by the university of an order to ban rallies and an order to disperse.
These orders have since been determined by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals
to have been lawful.
Some of the
Guardsmen on Blanket Hill, fearful and anxious from prior events, may have
believed in their own minds that their lives were in danger. Hindsight suggests
that another method would have resolved the confrontation. Better ways must be
found to deal with such a confrontation.
We devoutly
wish that a means had been found to avoid the May 4th events culminating in the
Guard shootings and the irreversible deaths and injuries. We deeply regret
those events and are profoundly saddened by the deaths of four students and the
wounding of nine others which resulted.
Kennedy |
At the same time, the Shootings led
to complete distrust of government officials.
Previously, they had largely been held in high esteem. John F. Kennedy, for example, had been a
model for Americans. Lyndon Johnson had
been responsible for getting the Civil Rights Act approved, ending legal discrimination
against women as well as against African-Americans.
So does the chasm between parts of
this population. Liberals were seen as
coddling protesting students while conservatives wanted the law-and-order of a
dimly imagined earlier era. The
liberal-conservative split radiates through all aspects of society, reflected
in highly partisan elections and dire claims made by both sides.
In many ways, Kent State was a
demarcation point between eras, the breaking point from the past to the
present. There have been many before:
The Revolutionary War, the Civil War, the Depression, World War II and 9/11. The Kent State shootings were different,
however. Americans died, shot by other
Americans.
The aftershocks still linger.
Long-time
religious historian Bill Lazarus, a graduate of Kent State University, usually
writes about religion and religious history.
He also speaks at various religious organizations throughout
Florida. You can reach him at www.williamplazarus.net. He is the author of the famed Unauthorized
Biography of Nostradamus; The Last Testament of Simon Peter; The Gospel Truth: Where Did the Gospel
Writers Get Their Information; Noel:
The Lore and Tradition of Christmas Carols; and Dummies Guide to Comparative
Religion. His books are available on Amazon.com,
Kindle, bookstores and via various publishers.
He can also be followed on Twitter.
You
can enroll in his on-line class, Comparative Religion for Dummies, at
http://www.udemy.com/comparative-religion-for-dummies/?promote=1
No comments:
Post a Comment