In honor of American Independence, here is an explanation why this country, apart from every other nation, initiated religious freedom and enshrined that ideal in its Constitution.
During
the American Civil War, from 1861-1865, devout Christians regularly contacted
the Secretary of the Treasury Salmon P. Chase about a serious concern that
overshadowed the bloody struggle raging in the eastern half of the embattled
country.
 |
| Watkinson |
For example, in 1861, Rev. M. R.
Watkinson, a minister from Ridleyville, Pennsylvania, wrote Chase: “One fact touching our currency has hitherto
been seriously overlooked. I mean the recognition of the Almighty God in some
form on our coins.” To Rev. Watkinson
and many other pious Americans, the lack of divine mention helped explain why
the South tried to separate from the northern states, not the economic and
social disagreements that everyone else cited.
Dominated by Christians, Congress naturally agreed
with the earnest correspondents and passed laws in 1865, the year the conflict
ended, and again in 1873 to allow the U.S. Mint to add the phrase “In God We
Trust” to various coins. Some coins received the new imprint; others did
not. Still, by 1938, all U.S. coins
carried that motto, according to the U.S. Department of Treasury website.
 |
| Luther |
That hardly appeased Rev. Watkinson’s religious
descendants who have continually pushed to inject a heavy dose of their religious
beliefs into society. That conflict
dates back close to 500 years.
Martin Luther, a dissident Roman Catholic monk, lit
the spark in 1517 by posting a famed thesis listing 95 complaints against Roman
Catholic policy. Within a decade, he
headed a burgeoning Christian sect developed in protest to the dominant Roman
Catholic religion and bearing his name.
Other Protestant sects followed, setting off a
series of crippling and inhuman wars between the two Christian divisions. Political
alliances and disputes, ranging from the Spanish Armada’s attempt to conquer
England, to the Inquisition, were all built around state efforts to control
religious beliefs. In England, Catholic and Protestant rulers took turns
harassing and burning religious opponents.
The devastation and resulting persecutions led many
people to flee, seeking refuge beyond the reach of government.
 |
| Huguenots |
The French Huguenots, Protestants regularly
harassed and finally massacred in Catholic France, braved the Atlantic Ocean to
transplant the bitter fight in the New World by settling in Catholic Brazil in
1555. Seven years later, a small group
of them headed north to Florida under Jean Ribault. They built a settlement near what is now St.
Augustine. It failed, and survivors
sailed back to England. In 1564, a new
batch of Huguenots moved in and built Ft. Caroline, named for the French king
Charles IX. Soon after, Ribault showed
up with a fleet and hundreds of soldiers.
The Spanish countered by building St. Augustine to
the north, cementing their hold on land originally explored and claimed by
Spaniard Ponce de Leon. Ribault tried to
destroy St. Augustine, but an ill-timed hurricane scattered his small navy. The Spanish under Pedro Menéndez then reciprocated and captured Fort
Caroline in 1565. They promptly
massacred 245 captured French soldiers on the beach.
Many
were hung from nearby trees. An
inscription left behind testified to the religious nature of the massacre:
"We do this not to Frenchmen, but to heretics."
 |
| Menéndez |
Even
the few who escaped were later butchered when, famished, they sought refuge
with the Spanish. Ribault was flayed and his skin sent to Europe to illustrate
the fate of nonbelievers.
Today, the area is still called Matanzas, meaning
“place of killing.”
Menéndez
wrote the Spanish king in his report:
"I had their hands tied behind their backs and themselves put to
the sword. It appeared to me that by thus chastising them, God our Lord and
your Majesty were served. Whereby this evil sect will in future leave us freer
to plant the Gospel in these parts."
Spanish
brutality, however, did not deter members of other faiths seeking refuge on
American soil.
In
1620, a group of Protestants discouraged by their failed effort to “purify” the
Church of England made landfall in what is now Massachusetts. They had planned to disembark at the existing
colony in Jamestown, Virginia, founded in 1607, but ended up further north.
 |
| Puritans |
Known
as Puritans, they quickly established themselves in an area where the natives had
been depleted by disease. Now completely
in control, the Puritans insisted on an autocratic theocracy, harassing
ministers who failed to kowtow to the dominant faith, even arresting and
hanging members of other Christian sects who mistakenly tried to live there.
One
of the Puritan ministers, Roger Williams, soon began to disagree with efforts
to impose the Puritan religion on all settlers.
Williams had been influenced by his earlier work with Sir Edward Coke,
considered one of English’s greatest jurist.
Coke was jailed for his opposition to royal power, but wrote the laws
that eventually led to the uprising against and beheading of King Charles 1.
 |
| Williams |
Williams
so outraged Massachusetts religious authorities that he was exiled in the winter
without resources and survived only through the help of Native Americans. Encouraged,
he established the city of Providence as a refuge for others like him. As one
of the basic tenets of the new colony, which eventually became the state of
Rhode Island, Williams insisted on freedom of religious belief and openly
welcomed anyone regardless of faith. As
a result, starting with laws passed in 1636, Rhode Island became the first
government anywhere to separate church and state.
The
state constitution said: "A person within the said colony, at any
time hereafter, shall be anywise molested, punished, disquieted, or called in
question for any differences in opinion in matters of religion ... but that all
persons may ... enjoy their own judgments and consciences in matters of
religious concernments."
The issue was not settled, of course, since
Massachusetts still loomed to the north of Rhode Island. Williams not only had to wangle a charter
after his colony was created, but continually feared an invasion by enraged
separatists.
While fending off political forays in England and
occasional claims of Rhode Island territory by residents of Massachusetts,
Williams remained firm to his convictions and produced a 400-page treatise, The Bloudy Tenent, of Persecution, for cause of Conscience,
Discussed, in A Conference betweene Truth and Peace. In
the text, which was loathed and then burned by furious religions leaders,
Williams wrote:
"It is the will and command of God that, since the coming of his Sonne the Lord Jesus, a permission of the most Paganish, Jewish, Turkish, or Antichristian consciences and worships, bee granted to all men in all Nations and Countries."
Williams cited 12 reasons
for his reasoning, including these:
"Fifthly, all civil states with their
officers of justice in their respective constitutions and administrations are
proved essentially civil, and therefore not judges, governors, or defenders of
the spiritual or Christian state and worship.
"Eighthly, God requireth not a uniformity
of religion to be enacted and enforced in any civil state; which enforced
uniformity (sooner or later) is the greatest occasion of civil war, ravishing
of conscience, persecution of Christ Jesus in his servants, and of the
hypocrisy and destruction of millions of souls.
"Tenthly, an enforced uniformity of
religion throughout a nation or civil state, confounds the civil and religious,
denies the principles of Christianity and civility …"
 |
| Charles II |
His arguments were accepted by English King Charles
II who was restored to his throne in 1660 after the Protestant Protector Oliver
Cromwell died. Charles confirmed Rhode
Island’s charter and insisted that no one was to be “molested,
punished, disquieted, or called in question, for any differences in opinion, in
matters of religion.”
Williams is also credited with inspiring John Locke, an English philosopher born one year before Rhode Island was established. In his Letter Concerning Toleration, Locke explained why government and state should be separated.
Williams is also credited with inspiring John Locke, an English philosopher born one year before Rhode Island was established. In his Letter Concerning Toleration, Locke explained why government and state should be separated.
 |
| Locke |
"I esteem that toleration to be the chief
characteristic mark of the true Church… That any man should think fit to cause
another man — whose salvation he heartily desires — to expire in torments, and
that even in an unconverted state, would, I confess, seem very strange to me …
I esteem it above all things necessary to distinguish exactly the business of
civil government from that of religion and to settle the just bounds that lie
between the one and the other. If this be not done, there can be no end put to
the controversies that will be always arising between those that have, or at
least pretend to have, on the one side, a concernment for the interest of men's
souls, and, on the other side, a care of the commonwealth."
Locke, in turn, provided the philosophical base supporting
the eventual construction of an idealized wall between church and state.
 |
| Rothschild |
The New York constitution banned
Catholics from holding public office.
While Catholics had free rein in Maryland, a colony created by and for
Catholics, Jews did not. In 1649,
Maryland did approve the Maryland
Toleration Act, also known as the Act Concerning Religion, which opened the door to Christian
residents who did not accept the trinity as described in the Catholic
faith. Jews, however, were excluded. The new law did set up the first legal
limitations on hate speech.
The Act was actually forced on Maryland
since the founding Catholics were soon outnumbered by newly arrived
Protestants. At the same time, it
recognized that Protestants now controlled the English government.
 |
| Jefferson |
Overall, though, the issue of religious freedom lay dormant through the War for Independence from 1776 to 1781 and the new country’s later conversion from a confederation to a republic.
In one glittering exception, in 1779, Thomas Jefferson, the governor of Virginia, tried to slip a law through the state legislature that would guarantee legal equality for Virginia citizens of any or no
religious beliefs.
He noted, “It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no God. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.”
His logic didn’t sway enough legislators, and the bill failed.
 |
| Henry |
A small man,
weighing about 100 pounds and barely more than 5 feet tall, Madison wielded
tremendous power through his pen. He
produced an essay titled Memorial and
Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments, in which he argued
against laws supporting any religion.
"…The
Religion then of every man must be left to the conviction and conscience of
every man; and it is the right of every man to exercise it as these may
dictate. This right is in its nature an unalienable right. It is unalienable,
because the opinions of men, depending only on the evidence contemplated by
their own minds cannot follow the dictates of other men: It is unalienable
also, because what is here a right towards men, is a duty towards the Creator…"
 |
| Madison |
Madison also pointed out something that defenders of
Christianity ignored: “Who does not see,” he wrote, “that the same authority
which can establish Christianity, in exclusion of all other Religions, may
establish with the same ease any particular sect of Christians, in exclusion of
all other Sects?”
The
aroused legislators then voted down Henry’s proposed law and revived
Jefferson’s proposal from a few years earlier.
In 1786, they passed the Virginia
Act for Establishing Religious Freedom containing the following clause:
"Be it therefore enacted by the General Assembly, That no man shall be compelled to frequent or support any religious worship, place, or ministry whatsoever, nor shall be enforced, restrained, molested, or burdened in his body or goods, nor shall otherwise suffer on account of his religious opinions or belief; but that all men shall be free to profess, and by argument to maintain, their opinions in matters of religion, and that the same shall in nowise diminish, enlarge, or affect their civil capacities."
Madison then took the
concept with him to the 1987 Constitution Convention in Philadelphia. He didn’t get it adopted, but an
aspect of the idea was included in Article VI:
"…no religious Test shall ever be
required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United
States.
No mention of a deity appears in the
document, a reality that galled pious Americans, the predecessors to Rev.
Watkinson who was preaching some 80 years later.
The forefathers who created the
United States were motivated by more than Locke’s philosophy or William’s
model. They were impelled by their own
beliefs. All were Christian; most were
pious. Among the 55 delegates, 49 were
Protestants and included Anglicans, Dutch Reformed, Methodists and Presbyterians. Two were Catholic. They recognized the conflicts that would
follow if any one religion were endorsed.
 |
| Washington |
Moreover, the most prominent members
were not devout Christians.
For example, George Washington, the
successful general and first president, was a deist. Nominally an Episcopalian, he also maintained a pew in a Congregationalist
Church, but members admitted he rarely attended.
As president in 1790, Washington
wrote: “All possess alike liberty of conscience and immunity of citizenship.
...For happily the Government of the United States, which gives to bigotry no
sanction, to persecution no assistance requires only that they who live under
its protection should demean themselves as good citizens.”
He was not unaware of the Bible,
citing a famous phrase from the book of Isaiah in a letter to the oldest American
Jewish synagogue, in Newport, Rhode Island: “May the children of the Stock of
Abraham, who dwell in this land, continue to merit and enjoy the good will of
the other inhabitants, while everyone shall sit in safety under his own vine
and fig tree, and there shall be none to make him afraid.”
Jefferson, who went on to be secretary
of state and the third president, was adamantly opposed to religious control. He produced a Bible that eliminated all
elements he felt were mythological, much to the consternation of the
faithful.
In an 1814 letter, Jefferson noted,
"In every country and every age, the priest has been hostile to liberty.
He is always in alliance with the despot, abetting his abuses in return for protection
to his own. It is easier to acquire wealth and power by this combination than
by deserving them, and to effect this, they have perverted the purest religion
ever preached to man into mystery and jargon, unintelligible to all mankind,
and therefore the safer for their purposes."
 |
| Franklin |
Elder statesman Ben Franklin was
also a deist who openly doubted Jesus’ divinity. John Adams, later the second president, had
left his church long before seeking higher office. In a treaty signed while in office, Adams assured
an Arab government that "As the Government of the United States of America
is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion... it has in itself no
character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of ... any
Mehomitan nation."
The end result was that the Constitution did not mention the name
of God in any manner. Soon after,
passage of the Bill of Rights augmented that view by insisting in its First
Amendment that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of
religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”
Such language guaranteed that religious figures would condemn the
document. The Rev. John M. Mason, an
Associated Reformed pastor in New York City and famed for his oratory, claimed
the failure to mention God and support Christianity was “an omission which no
pretext whatever can palliate.” He was sure God would “overturn from its
foundations the fabric we have been rearing and crush us to atoms in the
wreck.”
The Rev. Samuel Austin in 1811 echoed that prediction by saying Constitution
“is entirely disconnected from Christianity,” a failure that will “inevitably
lead to its destruction.”
 |
| Sanders |
The
effort has not stopped. In 1954, Senator
Ralph Flanders (R-VT), a mechanical engineer best known for introducing the
resolution to censor fellow Senator Joseph McCarthy (R-WI), proposed a new
amendment to the Constitution:
Section
1: This nation devoutly recognizes the
authority and law of Jesus Christ, Savior and Ruler of nations, through whom
are bestowed the blessings of Almighty God.
In 1962, when the Supreme Court outlawed government-written school prayers, another flurry of religion-saturated amendments showed up in the hopper, but none were approved. The effort was resurrected a year later when the Court banned public reading of the Bible and required recitation of the Lord’s Prayer in public schools.
Still, those pushing to make Christianity the legally recognized religion of the U.S. have made progress. In a 2013 poll, 51 percent of Americans said they believe the U.S. Constitution established a Christian nation. In fact, the opposite is true.
Nevertheless, “In God We Trust” remains on the currency. People still pledge allegiance to the United States with the words, “one nation, under God,” which were added in the 1950s. The President of the United States still takes the oath of office with the final coda, “so help me God,” words supposedly added by Washington at the first inauguration. (There's some debate whether he did or not, since the first reference doesn't occur until almost 40 years later.)
Nor does it appear that the debate will ever cease, not as long as devout believers continue to stand face to face with adamant supporters of religious freedom. Neither side has blinked in hundreds of years or is likely to back off anytime soon.
William P. Lazarus is a recognized religious historian who has written 14 books on the topic, including Comparative Religion for Dummies. He also did his doctoral work in American Studies at Case Western Reserve (OH) University and holds an M.A. in English from Kent State (OH) University. After a career as a newspaper reporter and magazine editor, he now teaches communication classes at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical (FL) University and writes a popular internet blog.
