Thursday, April 11, 2013

Anti-Semitism Continues to Rage


Man thought to be burning mezuzahs in New York
In most of the civilized world, Jews recently commemorated the Holocaust in solemn ceremonies that remembered the millions of Jews deliberately murdered during World War II.  In New York, at the same time, a Hispanic man went around burning Jewish religious markers that contain the prayer “You should love the Lord thy God with all your heart, with all your soul and with all your might.”

A few months earlier, Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi called on Egyptians to “nurse our children and grandchildren on hatred for Jews …”  Simultaneously, according to a separate report, “Anti-Jewish graffiti increasingly has appeared in Paris and Berlin, Madrid and Amsterdam, London and Rome, and synagogues have been vandalized or set ablaze in France, Greece, and Sweden.”  

Gibson
In addition, Iceland, Norway, Sweden and Switzerland have banned kosher practices, a vital component of Jewish food rituals. In Germany, officials there have identified more than 10,000 violent neo-Nazis, a number that climbed about 5 percent from the previous survey two years earlier.

Anti-Semitism is obviously alive and well.

Whether actor Mel Gibson is ranting about Jews in a drunken tirade or that young man filmed destroying mezuzahs in New York, Jews continue to be targeted.  

Worldwide, anti-Semitic attacks jumped 30 percent in 2012 compared with the previous year.  That included a murderous school shooting in France and anti-Jewish political rhetoric in countries like Hungary and Greece.

Researchers at Tel Aviv University said the increase can be linked to the surge in right-wing parties in Europe, who also have attacked other minorities.

That’s true in this country, too, where fanatics are happily assaulting gays verbally and physically because they don’t fit into their circumscribed views of “normal.”

Such abuse has been part of Jewish history for 2,000 years.  

A Stanford University study in the 1960s demonstrated the concrete link between the rise of Christianity and anti-Semitism.  Once a Jewish sect, Christianity broke away around the end of the first century C.E.  Fearful of being spied upon, Jewish leaders inserted a prayer that they knew was unacceptable to Jewish-Christians.  That forced Christians to move away from the synagogue and create their own houses of worship.

Modern view of Jesus
It also guaranteed animosity.

As Christianity developed clout, its leaders faced a problem: although their religion venerated a crucified Jew, members of that faith had rejected the burgeoning belief in him.  The solution was either to convert Jews or to ostracize them.  Both techniques have been tried with limited success.

Hatred turned out to be the most-enduring method.  Anti-Semitism, unknown prior to Christianity, became an integral part of the Roman Catholic Church’s teachings into the 1960s.  

Columbus
It was a weapon of mass destruction.  In Spain, for example, Jews were evicted in 1492 when the Spaniards finally captured the rest of the country from Muslims.  An estimated one-third of all Spanish Jews died as a result of the expulsion order.  When Christopher Columbus sailed off on his voyage of discovery that same year, his three ships were manned by a largely Jewish crew, men trying desperately to find a haven from Spanish hatred.

A study of Spanish history showed how anti-Semitism became ingrained as a result of a fight between two brothers for the crown.  One had a Jewish adviser; the other used that fact as a successful weapon to wrest the throne away.

Throughout Europe, Jews were limited to money-lending and tax collecting, two of the most onerous occupations.  Naturally, the population detested them.  At the same time, Jews were repeatedly gouged for money by kings and then forced from their homes when the debts grew too high.

Einstein
The hatred culminated in German concentration camps where Nazis systematically killed people judged less than human.  Jews were erroneously blamed for the German loss in World War I, for simultaneously creating communism, socialism and democracy.

Ironically, the 20th century was dominated by Jewish thinking: Albert Einstein in science; Sigmund Freund in psychology, and Karl Marx in politics.

People today again are looking for someone to blame for their problems and wind up targeting Jews, who supposedly have some control of world finances.  The fact that Jews have suffered through the same downturn doesn’t seem to matter.  
 
As one of the Tel Aviv researchers noted, “… the desire to harm Jews is deeply rooted among extremist Muslims and right-wingers…”

They want to find a convenient target to blame for their country’s problems and to boost their own status.  Through anti-Semitism, they attack “outsiders,” people of different beliefs and culture. 
That fire continues to burn unabated by logic or facts.

Long-time religious historian Bill Lazarus regularly writes about religion and religious history.  He also speaks at various religious organizations throughout Florida.  You can reach him at www.williamplazarus.net.  He is the author of the famed Unauthorized Biography of Nostradamus; The Last Testament of Simon Peter; The Gospel Truth: Where Did the Gospel Writers Get Their Information; Noel: The Lore and Tradition of Christmas Carols; and Dummies Guide to Comparative Religion.  His books are available on Amazon.com, Kindle, bookstores and via various publishers.  He can also be followed on Twitter.

You can enroll in his on-line class, Comparative Religion for Dummies, at http://www.udemy.com/comparative-religion-for-dummies/?promote=1

Monday, April 8, 2013

Humor and the Gay Marriage Debate


Back in the 1300s, a teenager almost became a saint by demanding people stop laughing.  His reasoning was based on the New Testament.  There was no laughter in the New Testament; therefore, he insisted, there shouldn’t any humor in life.

The mirthless teen died young and never reached sainthood, but his choice of evidence still carries a lot of weight.  Many people still base their decisions on biblical events and teachings.

Take the controversial question of gay marriage.   The sacred texts do contain commentary on that topic.  In the Jewish Bible, there are these statements:

Leviticus: 18:22: “Do not have sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman; that is detestable.”

Paul
 Leviticus: 20:13: “‘If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads. “

In the Christian Bible, the Apostle Paul wrote:
 
Romans 26-27: “Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.”

1 Corinthians 6:9-11: “Or do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers … nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. And that is what some of you were.”

Ancient Canaanite
The translations are not as simple or clear cut as they seem.  The reality is that each of these lines requires interpretation.

For example, many of the prohibitions in the Jewish Bible were created to separate Jews from their Canaanite neighbors.  As such, a condemnation of a homosexual relationship may simply be a requirement that Jews do not follow that pagan ritual.

Fr. Martin
After all, homosexual relations were common and accepted (even encouraged) in Greece, whose culture dominated the Middle East both before, during and after the biblical texts were composed.

It’s even trickier for the New Testament.  Jesus is never described as having any type of emotional relationship with anyone.  In the various stories, author and Jesuit priest Fr. James Martin noted, Jesus “enjoyed the friendship of both men and women. And was affectionate toward them and showed emotion and wept over the death of Lazarus, so we know he was a loving person.”

The popular novel, The Da Vinci Code, played up the idea that Mary Magdalena was Jesus’ wife, but author Dan Brown had no facts to base his plot on.

Don Imus
On his radio show, DJ Don Imus recently suggested Jesus was gay.  He cited the Gospel of Judas, a third century book discovered in the 1970s.  Of course, Imus just wants publicity, but he may have a point although no line in the Gospel of Judas can be stretched far enough to reach Imus’ conclusion.

Still, Jesus might have been gay.  As gay Episcopal Bishop V. Eugene Robinson said laughingly on The Daily Show: “Here’s a guy who — in a culture that virtually demanded marriage — was a single guy, spent most of his time with twelve men, singled out three of them for leadership and one of them is known in the Bible as ‘the one whom Jesus loved.’ ”

Fr. Martin disagreed, noting that "there's nothing in the Gospel of Judas, or any of the four accepted gospels, that shows in any way that Jesus was gay.”  On the other hand, Fr. Martin added, “As a human, Jesus had full human sexuality and like any human being he had sexual desires, but he was unmarried and celibate. And that is all we know about his sexuality."

Actually, we don’t know that either.  The biblical accounts never say if Jesus had any sexual relationship or didn’t.  Jewish biblical figures “knew” their wives and sired children, but none of that knowing and siring showed up in the New Testament.

As a result, to condemn gay relationships based on the Bible, someone must read between the lines and interpret in the same way that serious teenager did centuries ago to condemn laughter.

That would be absurdly comical if people didn’t take the gay marriage topic so seriously.

Long-time religious historian Bill Lazarus regularly writes about religion and religious history.  He also speaks at various religious organizations throughout Florida.  You can reach him at www.williamplazarus.net.  He is the author of the famed Unauthorized Biography of Nostradamus; The Last Testament of Simon Peter; The Gospel Truth: Where Did the Gospel Writers Get Their Information; Noel: The Lore and Tradition of Christmas Carols; and Dummies Guide to Comparative Religion.  His books are available on Amazon.com, Kindle, bookstores and via various publishers.  He can also be followed on Twitter.

You can enroll in his on-line class, Comparative Religion for Dummies, at http://www.udemy.com/comparative-religion-for-dummies/?promote=1

Thursday, April 4, 2013

Religion Isn't Going To Disappear


For years, popular pundit Bill Maher has been faithfully attacking religion in his writing and through the
Bill Maher
media.  From his movie “Religulous,” which was released in 2011, to his many, ongoing pronouncements, Maher has led the anti-religion charge. He doesn’t pull any punches.

Typical quote: "I certainly honestly believe religion is detrimental to the progress of humanity. You know, it’s just selling an invisible product. It’s too easy. These questions about what happens when you die – they so freak people out that they’ll just make up any story and cling to it. Things that they know can’t be true."

Lately, he’s been calling on everyone opposed to religion to stop worrying about offending people of faith and join in his crusade.

He may get a few to sign up, but their efforts are doomed to failure, as much as the medieval Christian crusaders were unlikely to capture and hold Jerusalem for any length of time.

Just for starters, religion in ingrained in the human psyche just as Jerusalem was then encased in a Muslim world.  It’s not a matter of culture.  Elements of religious thinking date far back in human history.

Religious symbols worldwide
Scientists trying to discern a reason have suggested that religion served as a kind of glue for the fledgling human society.  Basically, humans do not equipped with any special traits for defense, such as claws, size, strength or speed.  We only have our ability to work together.  Any antisocial human would likely have been an easy supper for African predators.

As a result, evolution would have guaranteed that any technique that bound humans into cohesive groups would have endured.  Religion served that function well.  It ensured people worked together for what is still seen as a common good. 

Nothing has changed in thousands of years.

In addition, religion is a powerful motivator, encouraging people to behave altruistically even when it’s not in their best interest.  The first behavior rules are directly tied to religion, the dos and don’ts later enshrined in the 10 Commandments.  It doesn’t matter if they are divine or human: they provide a framework that allows us to live in increasingly crowded communities.

Religion also provides hope.  The reality that we are a meaningless form of life on a meaningless planet simply making laps around the sun must have been too overwhelming for most people to contemplate.  So, they created the illusion of a God to give some meaning to their lives.
Lee

Peggy Lee sang about that concept in a Jerry Leiber-Mike Stoller 1960s’ song titled “Is That All There Is?”

Is that all there is? Is that all there is?
If that's all there is, my friends, then let's keep dancing,
Let’s break out the booze and have a ball,
If that's all there is.


I know what you must be saying to yourselves.
If that's the way she feels about it, why doesn't she just end it all?
Oh, no. Not me. I'm in no hurry for that final disappointment.
For I know just as well as I'm standing here talking to you,
when that final moment comes and I'm breathing my last breath, I'll be saying to myself:

Is that all there is? Is that all there is?
If that's all there is, my friends, then let's keep dancing,
Let’s break out the booze and have a ball,
If that's all there is.

That’s all there is, but we don’t party our way to oblivion because religion creates a smokescreen that gives us the illusion of more.  As a result, we create, we build, we work, we strive, no matter how ridiculous our religions are.
Moses getting the law

As Maher is well aware, it’s very easy to belittle any faith.  Can anyone really think a late relative is reborn as a cow?  Or that a universal God gave all the laws to a single man on top of a mountain, rules followed by virtually no one on Earth?  Or as Maher complained:

 … people who are otherwise so rational about everything else … believe that on Sunday they’re drinking the blood of a 2,000 year old god. That’s a dissonance in my head.

Maybe some of the nonsense, as Maher has pointed out, explains why a growing percentage of the population has deserted today’s religion.  That only means that modern faiths are likely in their lengthy death throes and, like the religions that preceded them, will fade away to be replaced by something that provides yet another false answer to our questions about our own existence.

In some form, however, religion itself will continue, regardless of Maher or anyone else he recruits to fight against it.  It’s in our DNA. No crusade will end its hold on the human psyche, and it will continue as long as there are humans to beguile.

Long-time religious historian Bill Lazarus regularly writes about religion and religious history.  He also speaks at various religious organizations throughout Florida.  You can reach him at www.williamplazarus.net.  He is the author of the famed Unauthorized Biography of Nostradamus; The Last Testament of Simon Peter; The Gospel Truth: Where Did the Gospel Writers Get Their Information; Noel: The Lore and Tradition of Christmas Carols; and Dummies Guide to Comparative Religion.  His books are available on Amazon.com, Kindle, bookstores and via various publishers.  He can also be followed on Twitter.

You can enroll in his on-line class, Comparative Religion for Dummies, at http://www.udemy.com/comparative-religion-for-dummies/?promote=1


Monday, April 1, 2013

Volts Zap Shroud of Turin


Image on the Shroud
An Italian scientist who has repeatedly embarrassed himself by trying to prove the Shroud of Turn is the authentic image of the dead Jesus is at it again.  Facts be damned.

Giulio Fanti, a professor of mechanical and thermal measurement at the University of Padua in Italy, insists earlier tests were tainted.  His, of course, are not.

How did the image appear?  According to Fanti, radiation from Jesus’ body created the image on the cloth.

Really?  How did this happen some 1850 years before electricity was harnessed?
fanti

By Fanti’s own measurements and in his words:  “a voltage of dozens of millions of volts would have been necessary; or, leaving the scientific field, a phenomenon connected with the resurrection.”

Dozens of millions of volts? Not an exact amount, but let’s work with it.

12-volt car battery
A flashlight typically uses 1.5 volts. Automobiles use 12 volt-batteries.  Consumer power lines use up to 240 volts.  It takes 2000 volts to execute a prisoner in an electric chair. A new stun gun supposedly generates 6.8 million volts, although 1 million is enough to evaporate anyone hit with it.  A Tesla coil produces 1 million volts.

In fact, most everything for miles around the Shroud would have been evaporated by the power surge if anything remotely close to millions of volts actually showed up.  After all, only the sun produces that many volts.

Electricity can be measured other ways, such as in watts and megahertz.  None of them come close to the millions of volts needed to put an image on a piece of cloth that wasn’t found until the 1300s.  There had to be a better way to capture Jesus’ likeness.

Was God limited in available media?  What was wrong with vellum, which is animal skin?  The Dead Sea Scrolls, which are authentically at least 2200 years old and written largely on vellum, endured into modern times. Vellum was common then; so was parchment and papyrus.  God needed cloth?

Nevertheless, Fanti’s claim – appearing in a book published just before Easter to boost sales -- got worldwide attention.  Why would anyone listen to such nonsense?  Because people want to believe.

The faithful continue to fight back the forces of reason and science by promoting such ridiculous theories.  It’s comforting to think their belief may have some basis in facts.  After all, it has to be very disconcerting to see that archaeology, astronomy, physics, history and every other research field have combined to undermine the most cherished ideas in religion.

The faithful counter with false science, such as Creationism, and straight out forgeries.

For example, one of my students, offended by learning that no records of Jesus’ death appear in any historians’ writings in that time period, showed me the death certificate of Jesus, which he said was published in the 1800s.  It was also manufactured by a French industry which arose then to counter the increasingly detailed and well-researched evidence that the stories about Jesus were generated by people desperate to find some answer to explain Jesus’ death.

If he was God’s son, then the sky must have opened, portends must have swarmed about, angels must have appeared.  No matter that none of that was seen or reported by anyone throughout the 1st century when Jesus must have lived and died.  It must have; therefore, it did.

No matter that Carbon 14 testing proved that the Shroud of Turin comes from the 1300s. either.  Or that the artists who created the Shroud's is known.

Pope Clement VII
In 1389, Bishop Pierre d’Arcis produced a report for Pope Clement VII and noted that a church official at Lirey had, “falsely and deceitfully, being consumed with the passion of avarice, and not from any motive of devotion but only of gain, procured for his church a certain cloth cunningly painted, upon which by a clever sleight of hand was depicted the twofold image of one man, that is to say, the back and the front, he falsely declaring and pretending that this was the actual shroud in which our Savior Jesus Christ was enfolded in the tomb, . . .”

Bishop d’Arcis said a predecessor, Bishop Henri de Poitiers, had “discovered the fraud and how the said cloth had been cunningly painted, the truth being attested by the artist who had painted it . . .”

As a result, the Roman Catholic Church has never accepted the Shroud as genuine.

Examining the Shroud
Nevertheless, Church officials still held out hope until tests were conducted on fibers drawn from the Shroud   Tests done on the Shroud in the 1980s then were completed extraordinarily carefully.  Three different laboratories in Arizona, Oxford, England and Zurich, Switzerland tested swathes taken “away from areas that were either charred or patched”  under direct observation of representatives of the Church. In this controlled test, samples not from the Shroud were also used.  The labs didn’t know which ones they were given.

The published results of this rigorous study showed that: within “at least 95 percent confidence for the linen of the Shroud of Turin of AD 1260-1390 (rounded down / up to the nearest 10 yr.). These results therefore provide conclusive evidence that the linen of the Shroud of Turin is medieval.”

Not that “scientists” like Fanti and millions of fervent believers would accept that.  No, they prefer to hypothesize millions of volts of electricity being needed to produce something any medieval artist could have done with a paintbrush.

Long-time religious historian Bill Lazarus regularly writes about religion and religious history.  He also speaks at various religious organizations throughout Florida.  You can reach him at www.williamplazarus.net.  He is the author of the famed Unauthorized Biography of Nostradamus; The Last Testament of Simon Peter; The Gospel Truth: Where Did the Gospel Writers Get Their Information; Noel: The Lore and Tradition of Christmas Carols; and Dummies Guide to Comparative Religion.  His books are available on Amazon.com, Kindle, bookstores and via various publishers.  He can also be followed on Twitter.

You can enroll in his on-line class, Comparative Religion for Dummies, at http://www.udemy.com/comparative-religion-for-dummies/?promote=1